Current:Home > MyA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -CapitalWay
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-25 10:44:16
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (21444)
Related
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Indicators of the Week: tips, eggs and whisky
- Missing Titanic Sub: Cardi B Slams Billionaire's Stepson for Attending Blink-182 Concert Amid Search
- Appeals court clears the way for more lawsuits over Johnson's Baby Powder
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Kourtney Kardashian Has a Rockin' Family Night Out at Travis Barker's Concert After Pregnancy Reveal
- How Bad Bunny Protects His Personal Life Amid Kendall Jenner Romance Rumors
- Warming Trends: Music For Sinking Cities, Pollinators Need Room to Spawn and Equal Footing for ‘Rough Fish’
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Kourtney Kardashian Has a Rockin' Family Night Out at Travis Barker's Concert After Pregnancy Reveal
Ranking
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Researchers looking for World War I-era minesweepers in Lake Superior find a ship that sank in 1879
- SNAP recipients will lose their pandemic boost and may face other reductions by March
- Exxon Pledges to Reduce Emissions, but the Details Suggest Nothing Has Changed
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Urging Biden to Stop Line 3, Indigenous-Led Resistance Camps Ramp Up Efforts to Slow Construction
- What's the deal with the platinum coin?
- Inside Clean Energy: The Coal-Country Utility that Wants to Cut Coal
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Inside Clean Energy: What’s a Virtual Power Plant? Bay Area Consumers Will Soon Find Out.
We asked the new AI to do some simple rocket science. It crashed and burned
Exxon announced record earnings. It's bound to renew scrutiny of Big Oil
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
FDA approves first over-the-counter birth control pill, Opill
Junk food companies say they're trying to do good. A new book raises doubts
Can Rights of Nature Laws Make a Difference? In Ecuador, They Already Are